Cukrársky posyp vs Rose en witte muisjes
Overall, Rose en witte muisjes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cukrársky posyp | Rose en witte muisjes |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 388 kcal | 397 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 2.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 95 g | 79 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cukrársky posyp has no fat, while Rose en witte muisjes has 2.4 g.
- Rose en witte muisjes has 17% less sugar (79 g vs 95 g).
- Rose en witte muisjes has 100% more protein (2 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Cukrársky posyp
Not available.
Rose en witte muisjes
suiker, anijs, tarwezetmeel, glucosestroop, glansmiddel (carnaubawas), kleurstof (karmijn)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cukrársky posyp or Rose en witte muisjes?
Overall, Rose en witte muisjes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cukrársky posyp has fewer calories: 388 kcal versus 397 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rose en witte muisjes has less sugar: 79 g versus 95 g per 100 g.