Comparison
Chocolate Hazelnut Finishing Sugar vs Cukrársky posyp
Overall, Cukrársky posyp has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Chocolate Hazelnut Finishing Sugar
Mccormick · 3.61 oz
Better choice 
Cukrársky posyp
KOVANDOVI · 450 g
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chocolate Hazelnut Finishing... | Cukrársky posyp |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 438 kcal | 388 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 87.5 g | 95 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cukrársky posyp has 11% fewer calories (388 kcal vs 438 kcal).
- Only Cukrársky posyp lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Chocolate Hazelnut Finishing Sugar
SUGAR, COCOA POWDER, UNSWEETENED CHOCOLATE, NATURAL FLAVOR
Cukrársky posyp
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chocolate Hazelnut Finishing Sugar or Cukrársky posyp?
Overall, Cukrársky posyp has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cukrársky posyp has fewer calories: 388 kcal versus 438 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chocolate Hazelnut Finishing Sugar has less sugar: 87.5 g versus 95 g per 100 g.