Crozets de Savoie au sarrasin vs Crozets de savoie au sarrazin
Overall, Crozets de savoie au sarrazin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Crozets de Savoie au sarrasin
Crozets de savoie au sarrazin
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Crozets de Savoie au sarrasi... | Crozets de savoie au sarrazi... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 366 kcal | 352 kcal |
| Fat | 3 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 2.5 g | 4.3 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 3.5 g | 7.1 g |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten | Eggs, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Crozets de savoie au sarrazin has 67% less fat (1 g vs 3 g).
- Crozets de savoie au sarrazin has 87% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.8 g).
- Crozets de Savoie au sarrasin has 42% less sugar (2.5 g vs 4.3 g).
- Crozets de savoie au sarrazin has 51% more fiber (7.1 g vs 3.5 g).
- Crozets de savoie au sarrazin has the better Nutri-Score.
- Crozets de Savoie au sarrasin is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Crozets de Savoie au sarrasin
Semoule de blé dur de qualité supérieure, farine de sarrasin (16,9%), œufs frais de poules élevées en plein air (14,9%). Traces de fruits à coque, soja.
Crozets de savoie au sarrazin
farine de blé tendre, farine de sarrasin, œufs frais, eau, sel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Crozets de Savoie au sarrasin or Crozets de savoie au sarrazin?
Overall, Crozets de savoie au sarrazin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Crozets de savoie au sarrazin has fewer calories: 352 kcal versus 366 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Crozets de Savoie au sarrasin has less sugar: 2.5 g versus 4.3 g per 100 g.