CRISTALINE Eau De Source Pétillante Aromatisée Pêche 1L5 vs Limão
Overall, CRISTALINE Eau De Source Pétillante Aromatisée Pêche 1L5 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
CRISTALINE Eau De Source Pétillante Aromatisée Pêche 1L5
Limão
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | CRISTALINE Eau De Source Pét... | Limão |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 10 kcal | 30 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 2.3 g | 6.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 2 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- CRISTALINE Eau De Source Pétillante Aromatisée Pêche 1L5 has 67% fewer calories (10 kcal vs 30 kcal).
- CRISTALINE Eau De Source Pétillante Aromatisée Pêche 1L5 has 62% less sugar (2.3 g vs 6.1 g).
Ingredients
CRISTALINE Eau De Source Pétillante Aromatisée Pêche 1L5
Eau de source (97,6%) ;sucre (2,3%) acidifiant : acide citrique ; arôme naturel de pêche et autres arômes naturels ; édulcorant: glycosides de stéviol issus de Stevia.
Limão
Água mineral natural gasocarbónica, frutose, extrato de frutos, sumo de limão (2.1%) e maçã (0,2%) obtido a partir de um produto concentrado, acidificante (ácido cítrico), aroma natural de limão.
FAQ
Which is healthier: CRISTALINE Eau De Source Pétillante Aromatisée Pêche 1L5 or Limão?
Overall, CRISTALINE Eau De Source Pétillante Aromatisée Pêche 1L5 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
CRISTALINE Eau De Source Pétillante Aromatisée Pêche 1L5 has fewer calories: 10 kcal versus 30 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
CRISTALINE Eau De Source Pétillante Aromatisée Pêche 1L5 has less sugar: 2.3 g versus 6.1 g per 100 g.