Comparison

Crème À La Pistache vs High Protein Pudding

Overall, High Protein Pudding has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCrème À La PistacheHigh Protein Pudding
Nutri-Score d a
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 205 kcal 84 kcal
Fat 13 g 2 g
Saturated fat 7 g 1.2 g
Sugars 16.5 g 4.5 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0 g 0.3 g
Protein 4 g 10 g
Additives15
AllergensEggs, Milk, NutsMilk, Crème, Lait, Lait écrémé

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • High Protein Pudding has 59% fewer calories (84 kcal vs 205 kcal).
  • High Protein Pudding has 85% less fat (2 g vs 13 g).
  • High Protein Pudding has 83% less saturated fat (1.2 g vs 7 g).
  • High Protein Pudding has 73% less sugar (4.5 g vs 16.5 g).
  • High Protein Pudding has 100% more fiber (0.3 g vs 0 g).
  • High Protein Pudding has 60% more protein (10 g vs 4 g).
  • High Protein Pudding has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Crème À La Pistache lists: Eggs, Nuts.
  • Only High Protein Pudding lists: Crème, Lait, Lait écrémé.

Ingredients

Crème À La Pistache

Lait des Alpes, Crème 26%, Sucre, Blanc d'oeuf, Pistache 3%, Poudre de lait, Amande amère, Carraghenane.

High Protein Pudding

90% proteines de lait, crème (lait), amidon modifié, cacao, lait écrémé (Origine: Allemagne), épaississants : carraghénanes ; stabilisant : phosphates de sodium; édulcorants: acésulfame-K, sucralose ; arôme, lactase

FAQ

Which is healthier: Crème À La Pistache or High Protein Pudding?

Overall, High Protein Pudding has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

High Protein Pudding has fewer calories: 84 kcal versus 205 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

High Protein Pudding has less sugar: 4.5 g versus 16.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons