Comparison

Crazy Craq Strong Cheese vs Monster Munch - goût emmental

Overall, Monster Munch - goût emmental has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCrazy Craq Strong CheeseMonster Munch - goût emmenta...
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 506 kcal 476 kcal
Fat 29 g 23 g
Saturated fat 4.7 g 3 g
Sugars 4.2 g 6.2 g
Salt 2 g 2 g
Fiber 1.4 g 2.4 g
Protein 8.3 g 4.7 g
Additives01
AllergensGluten, MilkGluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Monster Munch - goût emmental has 21% less fat (23 g vs 29 g).
  • Monster Munch - goût emmental has 36% less saturated fat (3 g vs 4.7 g).
  • Crazy Craq Strong Cheese has 32% less sugar (4.2 g vs 6.2 g).
  • Monster Munch - goût emmental has 43% more fiber (2.4 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Crazy Craq Strong Cheese has 43% more protein (8.3 g vs 4.7 g).
  • Monster Munch - goût emmental has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Crazy Craq Strong Cheese

Semoule de maïs 49 %, huile de tournesol, pomme de terre en poudre, semoule de BLÉ, FROMAGE 4 %, LACTOSÉRUM, arôme naturel, sel, son de riz, extrait de levure.

Monster Munch - goût emmental

Pomme de terre en poudre, huile de tournesol, amidon de maïs, chapelure de BLÉ, farine de BLÉ, amidon de pommes de terre, sucre, LACTOSERUM, sel, FROMAGES (dont EMMENTAL), arôme naturel, émulsifiant : mono - et diglycérides d’acides gras, paprika.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Crazy Craq Strong Cheese or Monster Munch - goût emmental?

Overall, Monster Munch - goût emmental has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Monster Munch - goût emmental has fewer calories: 476 kcal versus 506 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Crazy Craq Strong Cheese has less sugar: 4.2 g versus 6.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons