Comparison

Crayon d'assaisonnement à tailler vs Trüffel gehobelt in Olivenöl

Overall, Trüffel gehobelt in Olivenöl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCrayon d'assaisonnement à t...Trüffel gehobelt in Olivenöl
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 29 kcal 367 kcal
Fat 0.1 g 37 g
Saturated fat 0 g 6.5 g
Sugars 3.8 g 0.5 g
Salt 6.6 g 0.7 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 0.7 g 3.3 g
Additives20
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Crayon d'assaisonnement à tailler has 92% fewer calories (29 kcal vs 367 kcal).
  • Crayon d'assaisonnement à tailler has 100% less fat (0.1 g vs 37 g).
  • Crayon d'assaisonnement à tailler has no saturated fat, while Trüffel gehobelt in Olivenöl has 6.5 g.
  • Trüffel gehobelt in Olivenöl has 87% less sugar (0.5 g vs 3.8 g).
  • Trüffel gehobelt in Olivenöl has 89% less salt (0.7 g vs 6.6 g).
  • Trüffel gehobelt in Olivenöl has 79% more protein (3.3 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Trüffel gehobelt in Olivenöl has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Crayon d'assaisonnement à tailler

JUS DE CHAMPIGNONS, VINAIGRE BALSAMIQUE DE MODÈNE, BRISURES DE TRUFFE NOIRE (10%), SEL DE GUÉRANDE, AGAR-AGAR, ARÔME, GOMME DE CAROUBE.

Trüffel gehobelt in Olivenöl

Sommertrüffel (Tuber aestivum vitt.) 62,5 %, natives Olivenöl extra 35,5 %, Salz, Trüffelaroma 0,7 %.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Crayon d'assaisonnement à tailler or Trüffel gehobelt in Olivenöl?

Overall, Trüffel gehobelt in Olivenöl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Crayon d'assaisonnement à tailler has fewer calories: 29 kcal versus 367 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Trüffel gehobelt in Olivenöl has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 3.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons