Comparison

Couronne vs Couronne de rois bio

Overall, Couronne de rois bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCouronneCouronne de rois bio
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group — 4
Calories 350 kcal 312 kcal
Fat 14 g 7.9 g
Saturated fat 9 g 3.7 g
Sugars 15 g 8.8 g
Salt 0.9 g 1 g
Fiber 2.3 g 2.9 g
Protein 7.2 g 9.8 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedEggs, Gluten, Milk, Nuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Couronne de rois bio has 11% fewer calories (312 kcal vs 350 kcal).
  • Couronne de rois bio has 44% less fat (7.9 g vs 14 g).
  • Couronne de rois bio has 59% less saturated fat (3.7 g vs 9 g).
  • Couronne de rois bio has 41% less sugar (8.8 g vs 15 g).
  • Couronne de rois bio has 21% more fiber (2.9 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Couronne de rois bio has 27% more protein (9.8 g vs 7.2 g).
  • Couronne de rois bio has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Couronne de rois bio lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Nuts.

Ingredients

Couronne

Not available.

Couronne de rois bio

_Farine de froment_ (blanche [Autriche, Suisse, Canada], mi-blanche), eau, sucre, _beurre*_, _amandes_, _œufs_, levure, lait écrémé en poudre*, sel de cuisine iodé, petit-lait en poudre*, _farine de malt d'orge_, écorces de citron, gluten de froment, protéines lactiques*, lait entier en poudre';, poudre d'acérola avec fécule de manioc (améliorant de cuisson), enzymes (amylases, pentosanases).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Couronne or Couronne de rois bio?

Overall, Couronne de rois bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Couronne de rois bio has fewer calories: 312 kcal versus 350 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Couronne de rois bio has less sugar: 8.8 g versus 15 g per 100 g.

More comparisons