Cotton Candy vs Pismaniye
Overall, Cotton Candy has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cotton Candy | Pismaniye |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 404 kcal | 443 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 10.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 15 g | 74 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 1.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cotton Candy has no fat, while Pismaniye has 10.2 g.
- Cotton Candy has 80% less sugar (15 g vs 74 g).
- Pismaniye has 100% more fiber (1 g vs 0 g).
- Pismaniye has 100% more protein (1.5 g vs 0 g).
- Cotton Candy has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pismaniye lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Cotton Candy
sugar, flavoring, colorant
Pismaniye
_Wheat_ Flour, sugar, vegetable oil (palm, sunflower and cotton in varying), flavouring (vanillin), acidity regulator (citric acid)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cotton Candy or Pismaniye?
Overall, Cotton Candy has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cotton Candy has fewer calories: 404 kcal versus 443 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cotton Candy has less sugar: 15 g versus 74 g per 100 g.