Comparison
Candy Floss vs Cotton Candy
Overall, Cotton Candy has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Candy Floss | Cotton Candy |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 404 kcal | 404 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 99.8 g | 15 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cotton Candy has 85% less sugar (15 g vs 99.8 g).
- Cotton Candy has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Candy Floss
Sucre, concentré de jus de betterave, arômes.
Cotton Candy
sugar, flavoring, colorant
FAQ
Which is healthier: Candy Floss or Cotton Candy?
Overall, Cotton Candy has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cotton Candy has fewer calories: 404 kcal versus 404 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cotton Candy has less sugar: 15 g versus 99.8 g per 100 g.