Comparison

Côte avec os à griller vs Fjelltørket Fenalår

Overall, Fjelltørket Fenalår has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCôte avec os à grillerFjelltørket Fenalår
Nutri-Score c e
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 235 kcal 235 kcal
Fat 19 g 10.8 g
Saturated fat 9 g 4.9 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.2 g
Salt 0 g 8.7 g
Protein 16 g 31.1 g
Additives01
AllergensMilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Fjelltørket Fenalår has 43% less fat (10.8 g vs 19 g).
  • Fjelltørket Fenalår has 46% less saturated fat (4.9 g vs 9 g).
  • Fjelltørket Fenalår has 60% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Côte avec os à griller has 100% less salt (0 g vs 8.7 g).
  • Fjelltørket Fenalår has 49% more protein (31.1 g vs 16 g).
  • Côte avec os à griller has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Fjelltørket Fenalår is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Côte avec os à griller lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Côte avec os à griller

Côtes filet d'agneau (97%), préparation à base de BEURRE aux fines herbes (3%): beurre (1.5%), oignons, persil (0.1%), ail (0.06%), sel, fines herbes, épices, amidon (pommes de terre, tapioca), jus de citron (à base de concentré), arôme naturel d'ail. Peut contenir des traces de soja.

Fjelltørket Fenalår

Utbeinet fårelår, salt, sukker, konserveringsmiddel (E 250). Opprinnelse: Norge.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Côte avec os à griller or Fjelltørket Fenalår?

Overall, Fjelltørket Fenalår has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Côte avec os à griller has fewer calories: 235 kcal versus 235 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Fjelltørket Fenalår has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons