CoQ' Ailes, pané Indien vs Alitas Barbacoa
Overall, Alitas Barbacoa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | CoQ' Ailes, pané Indien | Alitas Barbacoa |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | b |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 189 kcal | 177 kcal |
| Fat | 11 g | 11.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.3 g | 3.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 20 g | 16.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- CoQ' Ailes, pané Indien has 60% less sugar (0.6 g vs 1.5 g).
- Alitas Barbacoa has 51% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.4 g).
- CoQ' Ailes, pané Indien has 19% more protein (20 g vs 16.2 g).
- Alitas Barbacoa has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
CoQ' Ailes, pané Indien
Not available.
Alitas Barbacoa
Alitas de pollo (87%), agua, azúcar, especias, plantas aromáticas, sal, maltodextrina, cebolla, ajo, tomate en polvo, aromas, aroma de humo, fibras vegetales, almidón, estabilizante (E-500ii), acidulante (E-262ii) y aceite de girasol.
FAQ
Which is healthier: CoQ' Ailes, pané Indien or Alitas Barbacoa?
Overall, Alitas Barbacoa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Alitas Barbacoa has fewer calories: 177 kcal versus 189 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
CoQ' Ailes, pané Indien has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.