Comparison

Confiture pêche de vigne SANS SUCRES AJOUTÉS vs Confiture pêche intense

Overall, Confiture pêche de vigne SANS SUCRES AJOUTÉS has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientConfiture pêche de vigne SAN...Confiture pêche intense
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 117 kcal 164 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0.2 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0 g
Sugars 15.1 g 39 g
Salt 0.1 g 0 g
Fiber 21.7 g 1.7 g
Protein 0.5 g 0.7 g
Additives11
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Confiture pêche de vigne SANS SUCRES AJOUTÉS has 29% fewer calories (117 kcal vs 164 kcal).
  • Confiture pêche intense has 60% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Confiture pêche de vigne SANS SUCRES AJOUTÉS has 61% less sugar (15.1 g vs 39 g).
  • Confiture pêche de vigne SANS SUCRES AJOUTÉS has 92% more fiber (21.7 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Confiture pêche de vigne SANS SUCRES AJOUTÉS has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Confiture pêche de vigne SANS SUCRES AJOUTÉS

Pêches de vigne 65 grammes, fibres végétales solubles 45 grammes, pectine, jus de citron concentré

Confiture pêche intense

pêches, sucre, jus de citrons concentré, jus de fruit de la passion, gélifiant : pectine de fruits. Malgré tous nos soins, cette confiture peut contenir des noyaux.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Confiture pêche de vigne SANS SUCRES AJOUTÉS or Confiture pêche intense?

Overall, Confiture pêche de vigne SANS SUCRES AJOUTÉS has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Confiture pêche de vigne SANS SUCRES AJOUTÉS has fewer calories: 117 kcal versus 164 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Confiture pêche de vigne SANS SUCRES AJOUTÉS has less sugar: 15.1 g versus 39 g per 100 g.

More comparisons