Comparison

Confit de foie de porc vs Confit de foie de porc

Overall, Confit de foie de porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientConfit de foie de porcConfit de foie de porc
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 332 kcal 380 kcal
Fat 30 g 37 g
Saturated fat 11 g 14 g
Sugars 0 g 0.5 g
Salt 1.8 g 1.7 g
Fiber 0 g 0.5 g
Protein 14 g 11 g
Additives11
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Confit de foie de porc has 13% fewer calories (332 kcal vs 380 kcal).
  • Confit de foie de porc has 19% less fat (30 g vs 37 g).
  • Confit de foie de porc has 21% less saturated fat (11 g vs 14 g).
  • Confit de foie de porc has no sugar, while Confit de foie de porc has 0.5 g.
  • Confit de foie de porc has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Confit de foie de porc has 21% more protein (14 g vs 11 g).

Ingredients

Confit de foie de porc

Foie de porc (47%), gras de porc, eau, viande de porc, sel, arômes naturel, poivre gris, dextrose, maltodextrine, arômes, exhausteur de goût: E635. Viande de porc: origine France.

Confit de foie de porc

Foie de porc* (50.7%), gras de porc*, sel, oignon déshydraté, arôme naturel de poivre, ail déshydraté, muscade, antioxydant : ascorbate de sodium. *Porc: origine France. Peut contenir des traces de céréales contenant du gluten, œuf, lait, moutarde et céleri.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Confit de foie de porc or Confit de foie de porc?

Overall, Confit de foie de porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Confit de foie de porc has fewer calories: 332 kcal versus 380 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Confit de foie de porc has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons