Confit de fleurs de violette vs Bluetengelee Holunderblüte
Overall, Bluetengelee Holunderblüte has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Confit de fleurs de violette
Bluetengelee Holunderblüte
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Confit de fleurs de violette | Bluetengelee Holunderblüte |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 264 kcal | 248 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 57 g | 61 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bluetengelee Holunderblüte has no fat, while Confit de fleurs de violette has 0.5 g.
Ingredients
Confit de fleurs de violette
sucre de canne, eau, fleurs de violette, gélifiant: pectine de fruits, acidifiant: acide citrique.
Bluetengelee Holunderblüte
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Confit de fleurs de violette or Bluetengelee Holunderblüte?
Overall, Bluetengelee Holunderblüte has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bluetengelee Holunderblüte has fewer calories: 248 kcal versus 264 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Confit de fleurs de violette has less sugar: 57 g versus 61 g per 100 g.