Comparison
Conchiglioni vs Conchiglioni
Overall, Conchiglioni has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Conchiglioni | Conchiglioni |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 353 kcal | 348 kcal |
| Fat | 1.2 g | 1.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 3.1 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3 g | — |
| Protein | 14 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Conchiglioni has 11% less sugar (3.1 g vs 3.5 g).
- Conchiglioni has 14% more protein (14 g vs 12 g).
- Conchiglioni has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Conchiglioni
Not available.
Conchiglioni
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Conchiglioni or Conchiglioni?
Overall, Conchiglioni has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Conchiglioni has fewer calories: 348 kcal versus 353 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Conchiglioni has less sugar: 3.1 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.