Comparison
Conchiglioni vs Conchiglioni
Overall, Conchiglioni has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Conchiglioni | Conchiglioni |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 348 kcal | 312 kcal |
| Fat | 1.1 g | 1.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 3.5 g | 3.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 12.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Conchiglioni has 10% fewer calories (312 kcal vs 348 kcal).
- Conchiglioni has 11% less sugar (3.1 g vs 3.5 g).
- Conchiglioni has 98% less salt (0 g vs 0.5 g).
- Conchiglioni has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Conchiglioni
Not available.
Conchiglioni
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Conchiglioni or Conchiglioni?
Overall, Conchiglioni has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Conchiglioni has fewer calories: 312 kcal versus 348 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Conchiglioni has less sugar: 3.1 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.