Concassé de tomate au jus vs Chopped Tomatoes
Overall, Concassé de tomate au jus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Concassé de tomate au jus
Chopped Tomatoes
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Concassé de tomate au jus | Chopped Tomatoes |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 24 kcal | 24 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 3.1 g | 3.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 1.3 g | 1.3 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Concassé de tomate au jus has 14% less sugar (3.1 g vs 3.6 g).
- Concassé de tomate au jus has 23% more fiber (1.3 g vs 1 g).
Ingredients
Concassé de tomate au jus
Tomates* pelées concassées 60%, purée de tomates* 39,9%, correcteur d'acidité : acide citrique. *Produits issus de l'agriculture biologique.
Chopped Tomatoes
Chopped Tomatoes, Tomato Juice, Acidity Regulator: Citric Acid.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Concassé de tomate au jus or Chopped Tomatoes?
Overall, Concassé de tomate au jus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chopped Tomatoes has fewer calories: 24 kcal versus 24 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Concassé de tomate au jus has less sugar: 3.1 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.