Compote Pomme Nature vs Compotes de pommes
Overall, Compotes de pommes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Compote Pomme Nature | Compotes de pommes |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 86 kcal | 57 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 20 g | 11 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 1.4 g |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Compotes de pommes has 34% fewer calories (57 kcal vs 86 kcal).
- Compotes de pommes has 45% less sugar (11 g vs 20 g).
- Compote Pomme Nature has 18% more fiber (1.7 g vs 1.4 g).
- Compote Pomme Nature has 100% more protein (0.3 g vs 0 g).
- Compotes de pommes has the better Nutri-Score.
- Compotes de pommes is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Compote Pomme Nature
Pommes 89%, sucre, antioxydant : acide ascorbique.
Compotes de pommes
Purée de pomme* 99%, jus d'acérola concentré*, antioxydant : acide ascorbique.* issu de l'agriculture biologique
FAQ
Which is healthier: Compote Pomme Nature or Compotes de pommes?
Overall, Compotes de pommes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Compotes de pommes has fewer calories: 57 kcal versus 86 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Compotes de pommes has less sugar: 11 g versus 20 g per 100 g.