Compote de pêches avec morceaux vs Broskve
Overall, Broskve has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Compote de pêches avec morce... | Broskve |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 111 kcal | 60 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 26.5 g | 12.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 0.4 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Broskve has 46% fewer calories (60 kcal vs 111 kcal).
- Broskve has 54% less sugar (12.3 g vs 26.5 g).
- Compote de pêches avec morceaux has 60% more protein (1 g vs 0.4 g).
Ingredients
Compote de pêches avec morceaux
Pêches 84%, sucre, antioxydant : acide ascorbique.
Broskve
Broskve, pitná voda, cukr, kyselina citronová
FAQ
Which is healthier: Compote de pêches avec morceaux or Broskve?
Overall, Broskve has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Broskve has fewer calories: 60 kcal versus 111 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Broskve has less sugar: 12.3 g versus 26.5 g per 100 g.