Colorante alimentario vs Colorante alimentario
Overall, Colorante alimentario has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Colorante alimentario | Colorante alimentario |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 353 kcal | 258 kcal |
| Fat | 2.2 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 43.5 g |
| Salt | 35 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 7 g | — |
| Protein | 5.8 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 2 | 8 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Colorante alimentario has 27% fewer calories (258 kcal vs 353 kcal).
- Colorante alimentario has no fat, while Colorante alimentario has 2.2 g.
- Colorante alimentario has 98% less sugar (0.7 g vs 43.5 g).
- Colorante alimentario has 99% less salt (0.5 g vs 35 g).
- Colorante alimentario has 100% more protein (5.8 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Colorante alimentario
Harina de maiz sal, colorantes (tartracina (E102), amarillo anaranjado S (E110)).
Colorante alimentario
jarabe de glucosa, agua, sacarosa, colorantes (E100, E120, E153, E161b, E133), gelificante E406, acidulante E330, conservante E202.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Colorante alimentario or Colorante alimentario?
Overall, Colorante alimentario has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Colorante alimentario has fewer calories: 258 kcal versus 353 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Colorante alimentario has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 43.5 g per 100 g.