Collations aux Fruits vs Apples + Blueberries Mini Fruit Bar
Overall, Apples + Blueberries Mini Fruit Bar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Collations aux Fruits
Apples + Blueberries Mini Fruit Bar
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Collations aux Fruits | Apples + Blueberries Mini Fr... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 318 kcal | 300 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0 g |
| Sugars | 45.5 g | 45 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 15 g |
| Protein | 4.6 g | 5 g |
| Additives | 6 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gelatin, Orange, Peach | Apple |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Apples + Blueberries Mini Fruit Bar has the better Nutri-Score.
- Apples + Blueberries Mini Fruit Bar is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Collations aux Fruits lists: Gelatin, Orange, Peach.
- Only Apples + Blueberries Mini Fruit Bar lists: Apple.
Ingredients
Collations aux Fruits
Sugars (fruit puree [grape, peach, orange, strawberry, raspberry], corn syrup, sugar, concord grape juice from concentrate), Modified corn starch, Gelatin, Citric acid (acidulant), Natural flavours, Sodium citrate, Coconut oil, Carnauba wax, Natural colours (turmeric, annatto, anthocyanins, carrot juice concentrate, blueberry juice concentrate)
Apples + Blueberries Mini Fruit Bar
APPLES, BLUEBERRIES.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Collations aux Fruits or Apples + Blueberries Mini Fruit Bar?
Overall, Apples + Blueberries Mini Fruit Bar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Apples + Blueberries Mini Fruit Bar has fewer calories: 300 kcal versus 318 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Apples + Blueberries Mini Fruit Bar has less sugar: 45 g versus 45.5 g per 100 g.