Comparison
COLA Classic vs Schuss
Overall, Schuss has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | COLA Classic | Schuss |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 32 kcal | 1 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 7.9 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Schuss has 97% fewer calories (1 kcal vs 32 kcal).
- Schuss has no sugar, while COLA Classic has 7.9 g.
- Schuss has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
COLA Classic
Eau gazéifiée, sucre, colorant : caramel au sulfite d'ammonium, acidifiant : acide phosphorique, arômes naturels, caféine.
Schuss
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: COLA Classic or Schuss?
Overall, Schuss has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Schuss has fewer calories: 1 kcal versus 32 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Schuss has less sugar: 0 g versus 7.9 g per 100 g.