Boisson a l’airelle rouge vs Schuss
Overall, Schuss has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Boisson a l’airelle rouge | Schuss |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 9 kcal | 1 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 2.3 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 7 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Schuss has 89% fewer calories (1 kcal vs 9 kcal).
- Schuss has no sugar, while Boisson a l’airelle rouge has 2.3 g.
- Schuss has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Boisson a l’airelle rouge
Eau, Sirop de sucre inverti, dioxyde de carbone, acidifiants (E330, E296), Jus d'airelles rouge concentré, arôme naturel, extrait de fruits et légumes(cassis et carottes noires) édulcorants(E955, E950), colorants (E150d) antimoussant(E900)
Schuss
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Boisson a l’airelle rouge or Schuss?
Overall, Schuss has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Schuss has fewer calories: 1 kcal versus 9 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Schuss has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.