COLA Classic vs Guaraná Antarctica zero
Overall, Guaraná Antarctica zero has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | COLA Classic | Guaraná Antarctica zero |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 32 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 7.9 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 2 | 9 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Guaraná Antarctica zero has no calories, while COLA Classic has 32 kcal.
- Guaraná Antarctica zero has no sugar, while COLA Classic has 7.9 g.
- Guaraná Antarctica zero has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
COLA Classic
Eau gazéifiée, sucre, colorant : caramel au sulfite d'ammonium, acidifiant : acide phosphorique, arômes naturels, caféine.
Guaraná Antarctica zero
Água gaseificada, extrato de guaraná, aromatizante, acidulante ácido cítrico, conservador benzoato de sódio, edulcorantes ciclamato de sódio, sacarina sódica, sucralose, INS 950 e 951, edulcorante natural glicosídeos de esteviol (INS 960), estabilizante INS 452i, antioxidante ácido ascórbico.
FAQ
Which is healthier: COLA Classic or Guaraná Antarctica zero?
Overall, Guaraná Antarctica zero has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Guaraná Antarctica zero has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 32 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Guaraná Antarctica zero has less sugar: 0 g versus 7.9 g per 100 g.