Comparison
Cœurs de sucrines vs Sucrines bio
Overall, Cœurs de sucrines has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cœurs de sucrines | Sucrines bio |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 14 kcal | 16 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | — |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 1.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 1.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cœurs de sucrines has 45% less sugar (0.6 g vs 1.1 g).
Ingredients
Cœurs de sucrines
Not available.
Sucrines bio
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cœurs de sucrines or Sucrines bio?
Overall, Cœurs de sucrines has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cœurs de sucrines has fewer calories: 14 kcal versus 16 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cœurs de sucrines has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.