Comparison

Cocoa Groove Chocolate vs Quinoa e riso

Overall, Cocoa Groove Chocolate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCocoa Groove ChocolateQuinoa e riso
Nutri-Score a e
NOVA group — —
Calories 275 kcal 547 kcal
Fat 2 g 37 g
Saturated fat 1 g 23 g
Sugars 1 g 36 g
Salt 0.7 g 0 g
Fiber 13 g 9 g
Protein 9.6 g 7 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Cocoa Groove Chocolate has 50% fewer calories (275 kcal vs 547 kcal).
  • Cocoa Groove Chocolate has 95% less fat (2 g vs 37 g).
  • Cocoa Groove Chocolate has 96% less saturated fat (1 g vs 23 g).
  • Cocoa Groove Chocolate has 97% less sugar (1 g vs 36 g).
  • Quinoa e riso has no salt, while Cocoa Groove Chocolate has 0.7 g.
  • Cocoa Groove Chocolate has 31% more fiber (13 g vs 9 g).
  • Cocoa Groove Chocolate has 27% more protein (9.6 g vs 7 g).
  • Cocoa Groove Chocolate has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Quinoa e riso lists: Nuts.

Ingredients

Cocoa Groove Chocolate

Not available.

Quinoa e riso

eali Cioccolato fondente extra con crispies alla quinoa e riso da Agricoltura Ingredienti da agricoltura biologica: "Pasta di cacao-*Zucchero integrale di canna (27%)-- za ato cacao-"Zucchero di canna-Crispies alla quinoa e riso (3%) (riso-quinoa-zucchero di c Può contenere tracce di latte, nocciole, mandorle. da Cacao: 61% minimo nel cioccolato

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cocoa Groove Chocolate or Quinoa e riso?

Overall, Cocoa Groove Chocolate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cocoa Groove Chocolate has fewer calories: 275 kcal versus 547 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Cocoa Groove Chocolate has less sugar: 1 g versus 36 g per 100 g.

More comparisons