Comparison

Cocktail de fruits vs Cocktail de fruits au sirop léger

Overall, Cocktail de fruits au sirop léger has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCocktail de fruitsCocktail de fruits au sirop...
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 65 kcal 62 kcal
Fat 0.9 g 0.1 g
Saturated fat 0.5 g 0.1 g
Sugars 11.5 g 13 g
Salt 0.5 g 0 g
Fiber — 1.5 g
Protein 0.6 g 0.5 g
Additives42
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Cocktail de fruits au sirop léger has 89% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Cocktail de fruits au sirop léger has 80% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Cocktail de fruits has 12% less sugar (11.5 g vs 13 g).
  • Cocktail de fruits au sirop léger has 94% less salt (0 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Cocktail de fruits au sirop léger has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Cocktail de fruits

Fruits 59% [cubes de pêches, cubes de poires, segments d'ananas, raisins entiers, demi-bigarreaux colorés (contient colorant : érythrosine)], eau, sucre, sirop de glucose-fructose, acidifiant : acide citrique, antioxydant : acide ascorbique, affermissant: chlorure de calcium.

Cocktail de fruits au sirop léger

Fruits (pêches en cubes, poires en cubes, segments d'ananas, raisins, demi-bigareaux (dont colorant : E127), eau, sirop de glucose-fructose, sucre, acidifiant : acide citrique

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cocktail de fruits or Cocktail de fruits au sirop léger?

Overall, Cocktail de fruits au sirop léger has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cocktail de fruits au sirop léger has fewer calories: 62 kcal versus 65 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Cocktail de fruits has less sugar: 11.5 g versus 13 g per 100 g.

More comparisons