Coca-Cola vs Inca Kola
Overall, Coca-Cola has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Coca-Cola | Inca Kola |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 21 kcal | 43 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0 g |
| Sugars | 2.1 g | 10.7 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Coca-Cola has 51% fewer calories (21 kcal vs 43 kcal).
- Coca-Cola has 80% less sugar (2.1 g vs 10.7 g).
Ingredients
Coca-Cola
Not available.
Inca Kola
Agua carbonatada, azúcar, Acidulante Ácido Citrico (E330), saborizante natural, Conservante Benzoato sódico (E211), Edulcorantes Acesulfamo K y Sucralosa (E950 y E955), colorante (E102) y cafeina (<150 mg).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Coca-Cola or Inca Kola?
Overall, Coca-Cola has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Coca-Cola has fewer calories: 21 kcal versus 43 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Coca-Cola has less sugar: 2.1 g versus 10.7 g per 100 g.