Coca-Cola vs Popping Boba Fresa
Overall, Coca-Cola has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Coca-Cola | Popping Boba Fresa |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | b |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 21 kcal | 58 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0 g |
| Sugars | 2.1 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | — | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 12 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Coca-Cola has 64% fewer calories (21 kcal vs 58 kcal).
- Coca-Cola has 39% less sugar (2.1 g vs 3.5 g).
Ingredients
Coca-Cola
Not available.
Popping Boba Fresa
agua, Jarabe de fructosa, zumo de frutas 5% (manzana), azúcar, acidulantes (E296, E327, E330, E331), espesantes (E401, E407, E415, E418, E1442), antioxidantes (E302, E300) conservador (E202), sal, aromas.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Coca-Cola or Popping Boba Fresa?
Overall, Coca-Cola has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Coca-Cola has fewer calories: 21 kcal versus 58 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Coca-Cola has less sugar: 2.1 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.