Classic Grape vs Cassis zero
Overall, Cassis zero has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Classic Grape | Cassis zero |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 14 kcal | 4 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 2 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cassis zero has 72% fewer calories (4 kcal vs 14 kcal).
- Cassis zero has 29% less sugar (1 g vs 1.4 g).
- Classic Grape has 100% more fiber (2.5 g vs 0 g).
- Cassis zero has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Classic Grape
Carbonated Water, OLISMART (Cassava Root Fiber, Chicory Root Inulin, Jerusalem Artichoke Inulin, Nopal Cactus Extract, Marshmallow Root Extract, Calendula Flower Extract, Kudzu Root Extract), Concord Grape Juice Concentrate, Lime Juice, Apple Juice Concentrate, Cassava Root Syrup, Tartaric Acid (From Grapes), Stevia Leaf Extract, Himalayan Pink Salt, Natural Grape Flavor.
Cassis zero
koolzuurhoudend water, zwarte bessensap uit concentraat (5%), gefermenteerd zwarte bessensap (2%), voedingszuur (citroenzuur), zoetstoffen (cyclaamzuur, acesulfaam, aspartaam, sacharine), aroma
FAQ
Which is healthier: Classic Grape or Cassis zero?
Overall, Cassis zero has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cassis zero has fewer calories: 4 kcal versus 14 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cassis zero has less sugar: 1 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.