Comparison
Civet de chevreuil vs Hirsch-Edelgulasch
Overall, Civet de chevreuil has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Civet de chevreuil | Hirsch-Edelgulasch |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 130 kcal | 105 kcal |
| Fat | 5.3 g | 5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.9 g | 2.4 g |
| Sugars | 2.3 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hirsch-Edelgulasch has 19% fewer calories (105 kcal vs 130 kcal).
- Hirsch-Edelgulasch has 17% less saturated fat (2.4 g vs 2.9 g).
- Hirsch-Edelgulasch has 35% less sugar (1.5 g vs 2.3 g).
- Civet de chevreuil has 73% less salt (0.6 g vs 2 g).
- Civet de chevreuil has 35% more protein (17 g vs 11 g).
- Civet de chevreuil has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Civet de chevreuil
Not available.
Hirsch-Edelgulasch
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Civet de chevreuil or Hirsch-Edelgulasch?
Overall, Civet de chevreuil has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hirsch-Edelgulasch has fewer calories: 105 kcal versus 130 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hirsch-Edelgulasch has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Hirschgulasch in Preisel... vs Civet de chevreuil
Civet de chevreuil vs Wildschwein-Wiener
2 Pavés de Sanglier Mari... vs Hirsch-Edelgulasch
2 Médaillons de Cerf Ros... vs Hirsch-Edelgulasch
Hirschgulasch in Preisel... vs Hirsch-Edelgulasch
Wildschwein-Wiener vs Hirsch-Edelgulasch
Sanglier au poivre de Si... vs Civet de chevreuil
Sanglier au poivre de Si... vs Hirsch-Edelgulasch