Comparison

Ciambella bicolore vs Ciambella

Overall, Ciambella bicolore has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCiambella bicoloreCiambella
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 425 kcal 445 kcal
Fat 21 g 22.5 g
Saturated fat 3 g 8.1 g
Sugars 27 g 35.8 g
Salt 0.9 g 0.8 g
Fiber 2.5 g —
Protein 6.8 g 4.5 g
Additives30
AllergensEggs, Gluten, MilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Ciambella bicolore has 63% less saturated fat (3 g vs 8.1 g).
  • Ciambella bicolore has 25% less sugar (27 g vs 35.8 g).
  • Ciambella bicolore has 34% more protein (6.8 g vs 4.5 g).
  • Ciambella bicolore has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Ciambella bicolore lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk.

Ingredients

Ciambella bicolore

Farine de blé, sucre, œufs, huile de tournesol, yaourt 8%, poudres à lever : E450, E500, amidon de blé, cocoa maigre en poudre1 1%, protéines de lait, eau, sel, émulsifiant : E471, arôme.

Ciambella

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Ciambella bicolore or Ciambella?

Overall, Ciambella bicolore has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Ciambella bicolore has fewer calories: 425 kcal versus 445 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Ciambella bicolore has less sugar: 27 g versus 35.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons