Chorizo Doux vs Chorizo extra doux Palacios
Overall, Chorizo extra doux Palacios has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chorizo Doux | Chorizo extra doux Palacios |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 476 kcal | 489 kcal |
| Fat | 42 g | 43 g |
| Saturated fat | 17 g | 16 g |
| Sugars | 3.9 g | 0.3 g |
| Salt | 5.1 g | 3.6 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 26 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chorizo extra doux Palacios has 92% less sugar (0.3 g vs 3.9 g).
- Chorizo extra doux Palacios has 29% less salt (3.6 g vs 5.1 g).
- Chorizo Doux has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Chorizo extra doux Palacios has 23% more protein (26 g vs 20 g).
- Chorizo extra doux Palacios is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Chorizo Doux lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Chorizo Doux
Chorizo choix NGRéO\ENTS gras de porc (origine : sel ; lactose ; plantes ; sucre ; dextrose ; C301, E250, E252 ; : boyau naturel de porc ; conservaieurs : E202, E235. 120 g de viande de porc ont été utilisés pour fabriquer 100 g de produit / fini. Transformé er, France à partir de viande de porc en provenance de l'Union Européenne et conditionné en France. DE PRÉPARATION 1 n minutes avant
Chorizo extra doux Palacios
Viande de porc, paprika, sel, ail, boyau naturel de porc
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chorizo Doux or Chorizo extra doux Palacios?
Overall, Chorizo extra doux Palacios has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chorizo Doux has fewer calories: 476 kcal versus 489 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chorizo extra doux Palacios has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 3.9 g per 100 g.