Comparison

Chocolate coated raisins vs Milk Chocolate Raisins

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChocolate coated raisinsMilk Chocolate Raisins
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 461 kcal 429 kcal
Fat 20.1 g 14.8 g
Saturated fat 12 g 8.8 g
Sugars 59.8 g 60.6 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.3 g
Fiber 3.4 g 2.2 g
Protein 5.5 g 4.5 g
Additives43
AllergensMilk, SoybeansMilk, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Milk Chocolate Raisins has 26% less fat (14.8 g vs 20.1 g).
  • Milk Chocolate Raisins has 27% less saturated fat (8.8 g vs 12 g).
  • Chocolate coated raisins has 36% more fiber (3.4 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Chocolate coated raisins has 18% more protein (5.5 g vs 4.5 g).

Ingredients

Chocolate coated raisins

Milk chocolate (57%) (sugar, milk powder, cocoa butter, cocoa mass, emulsifier (soya lecithin), flavouring), raisins (42%), glazing agents (gum arabic, shellac), sugar, sunflower oil, glucose syrup. Milk Chocolate contains cocoa solids 30% minimum, milk solids 20% minimum ALLERGY ADVICE: For allergens see Ingredients in bold. May contain peanuts and nuts

Milk Chocolate Raisins

Milk Chocolate (56%) [Sugar, Cocoa Butter**, Dried Skimmed Milk, Cocoa Mass**, Whey Powder (Milk), Milk Sugar. Butteroil (Milk), Emulsifiers (Soya Lecithins, Lecithins), Flavouring], Raisins (42%), Sunflower Oil, Glazing Agents (Acacia Gum, Shellac), Sugar, Glucose Syrup.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chocolate coated raisins or Milk Chocolate Raisins?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Milk Chocolate Raisins has fewer calories: 429 kcal versus 461 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chocolate coated raisins has less sugar: 59.8 g versus 60.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons