Comparison

Chocolat noir fourré pâte d'amande vs Ritter Sport Marzipan

Overall, Chocolat noir fourré pâte d'amande has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChocolat noir fourré pâte d'...Ritter Sport Marzipan
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 485 kcal 488 kcal
Fat 25 g 28 g
Saturated fat 13 g 12 g
Sugars 48 g 51 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 4.5 g —
Protein 6.8 g 6.9 g
Additives42
AllergensGluten, Milk, Nuts, MandeNuts, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chocolat noir fourré pâte d'amande has 11% less fat (25 g vs 28 g).
  • Only Chocolat noir fourré pâte d'amande lists: Gluten, Milk, Mande.
  • Only Ritter Sport Marzipan lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Chocolat noir fourré pâte d'amande

Pâte da'_mande_ 44% (poudre d'_amande_ 14% - sucre - sirop de glucose-fructose - stabilisant : sirop de sorbitol - sirop de glucose - eau - arôme - fécule de pomme de terre) - sucre - pâte de cacao - beurre de cacao - _beurre_ concentré - émulsifiant : lécithines de tournesol - arôme naturel de vanille.cacao : 49% minimum dans le chocolat noir seul.traces d'autres _fruits à coque_, de _gluten_ et d'_'_.

Ritter Sport Marzipan

Zucker, Kakaomasse, _Mandeln_ (15%), Kakaobutter, Invertzuckersirup, Emulgator: Lecithine (_Soja_), Feuchthaltemittel: Invertase, natürliches Aroma

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chocolat noir fourré pâte d'amande or Ritter Sport Marzipan?

Overall, Chocolat noir fourré pâte d'amande has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chocolat noir fourré pâte d'amande has fewer calories: 485 kcal versus 488 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chocolat noir fourré pâte d'amande has less sugar: 48 g versus 51 g per 100 g.

More comparisons