Chocolat noir Fèves de cacao vs Chocolate Negro Intenso
Overall, Chocolat noir Fèves de cacao has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chocolat noir Fèves de cacao | Chocolate Negro Intenso |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 543 kcal | 664 kcal |
| Fat | 44 g | 64 g |
| Saturated fat | 26 g | 40 g |
| Sugars | 16 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 15 g | 15 g |
| Protein | 8.1 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chocolat noir Fèves de cacao has 18% fewer calories (543 kcal vs 664 kcal).
- Chocolat noir Fèves de cacao has 31% less fat (44 g vs 64 g).
- Chocolat noir Fèves de cacao has 35% less saturated fat (26 g vs 40 g).
- Chocolate Negro Intenso has 99% less sugar (0.2 g vs 16 g).
- Chocolate Negro Intenso has 26% more protein (11 g vs 8.1 g).
Ingredients
Chocolat noir Fèves de cacao
Pâte de cacao°* d'Équateur et du Pérou 63%, sucre de canne°*, éclats de fèves de cacao°* 10%, beurre de cacao°* Cacao: 80% minimum dans le chocolat. °issus de l'agriculture biologique *issus du commerce équitable (100% du poids total) Peut contenir des traces de fruits à coque, lait, gluten et sésame. conserver dans un endroit sec et frais Va E
Chocolate Negro Intenso
cocoa mass*, cocoa butter*, cocoa nibs* 5%
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chocolat noir Fèves de cacao or Chocolate Negro Intenso?
Overall, Chocolat noir Fèves de cacao has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chocolat noir Fèves de cacao has fewer calories: 543 kcal versus 664 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chocolate Negro Intenso has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 16 g per 100 g.