Comparison

Chocolat Noir au Sel Rose de l'himalaya vs Sea Salt Dark Chocolate

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChocolat Noir au Sel Rose de...Sea Salt Dark Chocolate
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 545 kcal 552 kcal
Fat 34 g 33.6 g
Saturated fat 21 g 20.3 g
Sugars 43 g 46.2 g
Salt 0.4 g 0.1 g
Fiber 8.6 g 5.2 g
Protein 5.5 g 5.5 g
Additives21
AllergensNone listedSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sea Salt Dark Chocolate has 84% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
  • Chocolat Noir au Sel Rose de l'himalaya has 40% more fiber (8.6 g vs 5.2 g).
  • Only Sea Salt Dark Chocolate lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Chocolat Noir au Sel Rose de l'himalaya

Pâte de cacao*, sucre de canne*, beurre de cacao*, émulsifiant: lécithine de tournesol*; sel rose de l'Himalaya 0,5%, gousse de vanille**. Cacao: 56% minimum. Peut contenir du lait, des fruits à coque et du soja. Chocolat fabriqué en Suisse. *Ingrédients agricoles issus de l'agriculture biologique. °Commerce Equitable contrôlé selon le référentiel Fair for Life: 99% du total des ingrédients.

Sea Salt Dark Chocolate

sugar, cocoa mass, cocoa butter, emulsifier: lecithins (soya), sea salt (0,5%), vanilla extract, dark chocolate contains cocoa solids 52% minimum, allergy advice: for allergens, see ingredients in bold, may contain peanuts, nuts and milk

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chocolat Noir au Sel Rose de l'himalaya or Sea Salt Dark Chocolate?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chocolat Noir au Sel Rose de l'himalaya has fewer calories: 545 kcal versus 552 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chocolat Noir au Sel Rose de l'himalaya has less sugar: 43 g versus 46.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons