Comparison

Chocolat Noir à la Framboise vs Chocolat noir framboise éclats de cacao

Overall, Chocolat noir framboise éclats de cacao has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChocolat Noir à la FramboiseChocolat noir framboise écla...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 530 kcal 564 kcal
Fat 34 g 39 g
Saturated fat 21 g 24 g
Sugars 43 g 33 g
Salt 0.1 g 0 g
Fiber 8 g 9.2 g
Protein 6 g 8.4 g
Additives70
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chocolat Noir à la Framboise has 13% less fat (34 g vs 39 g).
  • Chocolat Noir à la Framboise has 13% less saturated fat (21 g vs 24 g).
  • Chocolat noir framboise éclats de cacao has 23% less sugar (33 g vs 43 g).
  • Chocolat noir framboise éclats de cacao has 13% more fiber (9.2 g vs 8 g).
  • Chocolat noir framboise éclats de cacao has 29% more protein (8.4 g vs 6 g).

Ingredients

Chocolat Noir à la Framboise

pâte de cacao, sucre, pépites à la framboise (16%) [purée de framboise (5,1%), sucre, pomme, dextrose, fibres d'ananas, colorant . anthocyanes, gélifiant : alginate de sodium, stabilisant : phosphate di-calcique, arômes, correcteur d'acidité : acide citrique], beurre de cacao, émulsifiant : lécithines (tournesol), arômes.

Chocolat noir framboise éclats de cacao

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chocolat Noir à la Framboise or Chocolat noir framboise éclats de cacao?

Overall, Chocolat noir framboise éclats de cacao has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chocolat Noir à la Framboise has fewer calories: 530 kcal versus 564 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chocolat noir framboise éclats de cacao has less sugar: 33 g versus 43 g per 100 g.

More comparisons