Chips saveur poulet rôti vs Lays salt & black pepper
Overall, Chips saveur poulet rôti has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chips saveur poulet rôti | Lays salt & black pepper |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 511 kcal | 520 kcal |
| Fat | 33 g | 32 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.6 g | 3.2 g |
| Sugars | 1.9 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 5 g | 4.8 g |
| Protein | 6.1 g | 6.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 7 |
| Allergens | None listed | Celery, Gluten, Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chips saveur poulet rôti has 19% less saturated fat (2.6 g vs 3.2 g).
- Lays salt & black pepper has 21% less sugar (1.5 g vs 1.9 g).
- Chips saveur poulet rôti has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Lays salt & black pepper lists: Celery, Gluten, Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Chips saveur poulet rôti
Pommes de terre 62% (France), huile de tournesol, arôme naturel, sel, oignon, persil, ail, épices et herbes.
Lays salt & black pepper
Pommes de terre, huiles végétales (tournesol, colza, en proportion variable), arômes (céleri, lait, lactose, blé, soja, poivre noir), sel, sucre, protéine de blé hydrolysée, sel fumé, glutamate monosodique, guanylate disodique, inosinate disodique), antioxydants (extrait de romarin, acide ascorbique, extrait riche en tocopherols, acide citrique),
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chips saveur poulet rôti or Lays salt & black pepper?
Overall, Chips saveur poulet rôti has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chips saveur poulet rôti has fewer calories: 511 kcal versus 520 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lays salt & black pepper has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 1.9 g per 100 g.