Comparison

Chips paysannes vs Tortilla chips chili

Overall, Tortilla chips chili has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChips paysannesTortilla chips chili
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 514 kcal 484 kcal
Fat 30 g 23 g
Saturated fat 3.6 g 2.1 g
Sugars 0.5 g 1.7 g
Salt 1.3 g 0.8 g
Fiber 3.9 g 6.5 g
Protein 6.2 g 8 g
Additives02
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tortilla chips chili has 23% less fat (23 g vs 30 g).
  • Tortilla chips chili has 42% less saturated fat (2.1 g vs 3.6 g).
  • Chips paysannes has 71% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Tortilla chips chili has 39% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Tortilla chips chili has 40% more fiber (6.5 g vs 3.9 g).
  • Tortilla chips chili has 22% more protein (8 g vs 6.2 g).
  • Tortilla chips chili has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Chips paysannes is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Chips paysannes

potatoes 60%, vegetable oils 39% (sunflower, rapeseed), salt,

Tortilla chips chili

corn kernels, sunflower oil rich in oleic acid, seasoning (dehydrated vegetables (garlic powder, onion powder, tomato powder), spices (chilli pepper, cumin seeds), cooking salt, dextrose, maltodextrin, yeast extract, oregano, sugar, acidity regulator (citric acid), color (paprika extract), natural oregano flavor), packaged in a protective atmosphere,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chips paysannes or Tortilla chips chili?

Overall, Tortilla chips chili has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tortilla chips chili has fewer calories: 484 kcal versus 514 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chips paysannes has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons