Chips paysanne nature vs Chips sel de mer et poivre noir
Overall, Chips sel de mer et poivre noir has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chips paysanne nature | Chips sel de mer et poivre n... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 514 kcal | 469 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 26 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.2 g | 2.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 3.9 g | 5.4 g |
| Protein | 6.2 g | 6.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chips sel de mer et poivre noir has 13% less fat (26 g vs 30 g).
- Chips sel de mer et poivre noir has 28% less saturated fat (2.3 g vs 3.2 g).
- Chips paysanne nature has 58% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.2 g).
- Chips sel de mer et poivre noir has 25% less salt (1 g vs 1.3 g).
- Chips sel de mer et poivre noir has 28% more fiber (5.4 g vs 3.9 g).
- Chips sel de mer et poivre noir has the better Nutri-Score.
- Chips paysanne nature is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Chips paysanne nature
Pommes de terre (65%),huiles végétales (tournesol, colza, maïs en proportion variable),sel
Chips sel de mer et poivre noir
Pomme de terre, huile de tournesol, farine de riz, sel de mer, épices (poivre noir concassé, poivre noir moulu), sucre, extrait de levure, arôme naturel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chips paysanne nature or Chips sel de mer et poivre noir?
Overall, Chips sel de mer et poivre noir has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chips sel de mer et poivre noir has fewer calories: 469 kcal versus 514 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chips paysanne nature has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.