Comparison

Chips de Légumes vs Chataka pataka

Overall, Chataka pataka has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChips de LégumesChataka pataka
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 489 kcal 551 kcal
Fat 31 g 32.7 g
Saturated fat 2.7 g 15 g
Sugars 31 g 1 g
Salt 1 g 1 g
Fiber — 1 g
Protein 5.5 g 6.8 g
Additives05
AllergensNone listedSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chips de Légumes has 11% fewer calories (489 kcal vs 551 kcal).
  • Chips de Légumes has 82% less saturated fat (2.7 g vs 15 g).
  • Chataka pataka has 97% less sugar (1 g vs 31 g).
  • Chataka pataka has 19% more protein (6.8 g vs 5.5 g).
  • Chataka pataka has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Chips de Légumes is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Chataka pataka lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Chips de Légumes

68,4% mélange de légumes (betterave, carotte, panais, patate douce), 31% huile de tournesol, sel.

Chataka pataka

Rice meal (43%), edible vegetable oil (palmolein, rice bran), corn meal (13%), chickpea flour, edible common salt, chilli powder, black salt, maltodextrin, dehydrated vegetable powder (garlic, onion, lemon), hydrolyzed vegetable protein (soya), acidity regulator (INS 330), flavour enhancer (INS 627, INS 631), yeast extract, oregano, anticaking agent (INS 551), natural & nature identical flavouring substances (chilli, lemon), paprika extract (INS 160c).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chips de Légumes or Chataka pataka?

Overall, Chataka pataka has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chips de Légumes has fewer calories: 489 kcal versus 551 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chataka pataka has less sugar: 1 g versus 31 g per 100 g.

More comparisons