Chips De Kale Crues - Red Cheezy vs Chips de Kale
Overall, Chips De Kale Crues - Red Cheezy has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chips De Kale Crues - Red Ch... | Chips de Kale |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 181 kcal | 564 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 46 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 4.8 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 6.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1.4 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chips De Kale Crues - Red Cheezy has 68% fewer calories (181 kcal vs 564 kcal).
- Chips De Kale Crues - Red Cheezy has 98% less fat (1 g vs 46 g).
- Chips De Kale Crues - Red Cheezy has 79% less saturated fat (1 g vs 4.8 g).
- Chips De Kale Crues - Red Cheezy has no sugar, while Chips de Kale has 6.2 g.
- Chips De Kale Crues - Red Cheezy has no salt, while Chips de Kale has 1.4 g.
- Chips de Kale has 19% more protein (21 g vs 17 g).
- Chips De Kale Crues - Red Cheezy has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Chips De Kale Crues - Red Cheezy lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Chips De Kale Crues - Red Cheezy
chou kale*, amande crue* vinaigre de cidre non-pasteurisé*, tamari*, paprika doux* , levure non maltée* , sel de Guérande * Produit issu de l'agriculture biologique Valeur nutritive pour 100 g > calories
Chips de Kale
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chips De Kale Crues - Red Cheezy or Chips de Kale?
Overall, Chips De Kale Crues - Red Cheezy has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chips De Kale Crues - Red Cheezy has fewer calories: 181 kcal versus 564 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chips De Kale Crues - Red Cheezy has less sugar: 0 g versus 6.2 g per 100 g.