Comparison

Chips au paprika vs Amaizin organic tortilla chips paprika

Overall, Amaizin organic tortilla chips paprika has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChips au paprikaAmaizin organic tortilla chi...
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 485 kcal 480 kcal
Fat 27 g 22 g
Saturated fat 2.7 g 2.2 g
Sugars 2.5 g 1.5 g
Salt 1.7 g 1.3 g
Fiber 6.3 g —
Protein 7.9 g 6.7 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Amaizin organic tortilla chips paprika has 19% less fat (22 g vs 27 g).
  • Amaizin organic tortilla chips paprika has 19% less saturated fat (2.2 g vs 2.7 g).
  • Amaizin organic tortilla chips paprika has 40% less sugar (1.5 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Amaizin organic tortilla chips paprika has 22% less salt (1.3 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Chips au paprika has 15% more protein (7.9 g vs 6.7 g).

Ingredients

Chips au paprika

Pommes de terre, huile de tournesol, épices (paprika, chili), sucres (dextrose, saccharose), sel, amidon de pomme de terre, oignon en poudre, ail en poudre, extrait de levure.

Amaizin organic tortilla chips paprika

Corn flour* (73%), sunflower oil*, paprika mix* (5%) (seasalt, glucose syrup*, spices* (paprika*, black pepper* garlic*), sugar*, onion*, tomato*, paprika extract*, lovage*). May contain traces of soy. *Organic farming

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chips au paprika or Amaizin organic tortilla chips paprika?

Overall, Amaizin organic tortilla chips paprika has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Amaizin organic tortilla chips paprika has fewer calories: 480 kcal versus 485 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Amaizin organic tortilla chips paprika has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons