Comparison

All natural chips paprika vs Amaizin organic tortilla chips paprika

Overall, Amaizin organic tortilla chips paprika has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientAll natural chips paprikaAmaizin organic tortilla chi...
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group — 4
Calories 520 kcal 480 kcal
Fat 31 g 22 g
Saturated fat 2.4 g 2.2 g
Sugars 2.3 g 1.5 g
Salt 2 g 1.3 g
Protein 5.9 g 6.7 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Amaizin organic tortilla chips paprika has 29% less fat (22 g vs 31 g).
  • Amaizin organic tortilla chips paprika has 35% less sugar (1.5 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Amaizin organic tortilla chips paprika has 35% less salt (1.3 g vs 2 g).
  • Amaizin organic tortilla chips paprika has 12% more protein (6.7 g vs 5.9 g).

Ingredients

All natural chips paprika

Snack Fun All - NATURAL CHIPS PAPRIKA GESCHMACK/GOÛT / GUSTO Serviervorschlag/Suggestion de présentation/Suggerimento di presentazione/Tálalási javaslat / Predlog za serviran 06.08.2026 H7 L 0010130930 50219

Amaizin organic tortilla chips paprika

Corn flour* (73%), sunflower oil*, paprika mix* (5%) (seasalt, glucose syrup*, spices* (paprika*, black pepper* garlic*), sugar*, onion*, tomato*, paprika extract*, lovage*). May contain traces of soy. *Organic farming

FAQ

Which is healthier: All natural chips paprika or Amaizin organic tortilla chips paprika?

Overall, Amaizin organic tortilla chips paprika has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Amaizin organic tortilla chips paprika has fewer calories: 480 kcal versus 520 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Amaizin organic tortilla chips paprika has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons