Chips allégée au sel marin de Camargue vs Calorie Controlled Ready Salted Crinkle Cut Crisps
Overall, Chips allégée au sel marin de Camargue has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Chips allégée au sel marin de Camargue
Calorie Controlled Ready Salted Crinkle Cut Crisps
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chips allégée au sel marin d... | Calorie Controlled Ready Sal... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 474 kcal | 484 kcal |
| Fat | 24 g | 22.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.9 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 5 g | 4.1 g |
| Protein | 6 g | 7.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Calorie Controlled Ready Salted Crinkle Cut Crisps has no sugar, while Chips allégée au sel marin de Camargue has 2 g.
- Chips allégée au sel marin de Camargue has 18% more fiber (5 g vs 4.1 g).
- Calorie Controlled Ready Salted Crinkle Cut Crisps has 24% more protein (7.9 g vs 6 g).
- Chips allégée au sel marin de Camargue has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Chips allégée au sel marin de Camargue
Pommes de terre, huile végétale, sel marin de Camargue.
Calorie Controlled Ready Salted Crinkle Cut Crisps
potatoes, high oleic sunflower oil, salt
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chips allégée au sel marin de Camargue or Calorie Controlled Ready Salted Crinkle Cut Crisps?
Overall, Chips allégée au sel marin de Camargue has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chips allégée au sel marin de Camargue has fewer calories: 474 kcal versus 484 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Calorie Controlled Ready Salted Crinkle Cut Crisps has less sugar: 0 g versus 2 g per 100 g.