Comparison

Chili sin carne vs Chili sin carne vegan

Overall, Chili sin carne vegan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChili sin carneChili sin carne vegan
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 101 kcal 76 kcal
Fat 3 g 2 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 0.3 g
Sugars 1.1 g 1 g
Salt 0.7 g 0.9 g
Fiber 3.3 g 4.1 g
Protein 4.8 g 4.9 g
Additives02
AllergensNone listedGluten, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chili sin carne vegan has 25% fewer calories (76 kcal vs 101 kcal).
  • Chili sin carne vegan has 33% less fat (2 g vs 3 g).
  • Chili sin carne vegan has 20% more fiber (4.1 g vs 3.3 g).
  • Chili sin carne vegan has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Chili sin carne is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Chili sin carne vegan lists: Gluten, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Chili sin carne

Riz cuit 35%, tomates 18%. haricots rouges 12%, eau, poivrons rouges 6%, protéines de pois texturées" 3%, oignons " 3%, double concentré de tomates 1%, huile d'olive vierge extra", purée d'ail", épices" 0.8%, huile de tournesol", sel, amidon"

Chili sin carne vegan

Eau, 29% haricots rouges, 5,5% maïs, 5% poivrons, 4% oignons, 3% tomates, 3% protéine de soja texturée, double concentré de tomates, huile de colza, sel, épices, sucre, amidon modifié (maïs), épaississant: gomme guar; farine de blé. Traces éventuelles d'œufs, de lait et de céleri.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chili sin carne or Chili sin carne vegan?

Overall, Chili sin carne vegan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chili sin carne vegan has fewer calories: 76 kcal versus 101 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chili sin carne vegan has less sugar: 1 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons