Comparison

Chili Seasoning vs Curry Tandoori medium force 3

Overall, Chili Seasoning has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChili SeasoningCurry Tandoori medium force...
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 44 kcal 328 kcal
Fat 0.3 g 13 g
Saturated fat 0 g 1.4 g
Sugars 5.3 g 3.1 g
Salt 0.2 g 8.1 g
Fiber 1.7 g 0 g
Protein 1.9 g 13 g
Additives02
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chili Seasoning has 87% fewer calories (44 kcal vs 328 kcal).
  • Chili Seasoning has 98% less fat (0.3 g vs 13 g).
  • Chili Seasoning has 98% less saturated fat (0 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Curry Tandoori medium force 3 has 41% less sugar (3.1 g vs 5.3 g).
  • Chili Seasoning has 97% less salt (0.2 g vs 8.1 g).
  • Chili Seasoning has 100% more fiber (1.7 g vs 0 g).
  • Curry Tandoori medium force 3 has 86% more protein (13 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Chili Seasoning is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Chili Seasoning

Chili peppers, sea salt, dehydrated lime juice, silicon dioxide

Curry Tandoori medium force 3

Graine de coriandre, cumin (14%) ail déshydraté (11%), poudre de Chili (piment, cumin, sel, origan, ail), sel, gingembre (6%), oignon déshydraté, colorant : extrait de paprika, laurier, badiane, cannelle, poivre noir, girofle, cardamome, correcteur d'acidite : acide citrique, curcuma, macis, huile de tournesol.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chili Seasoning or Curry Tandoori medium force 3?

Overall, Chili Seasoning has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chili Seasoning has fewer calories: 44 kcal versus 328 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Curry Tandoori medium force 3 has less sugar: 3.1 g versus 5.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons