Comparison

Chili Seasoning vs Mélange pour volaille

Overall, Chili Seasoning has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChili SeasoningMélange pour volaille
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 44 kcal 273 kcal
Fat 0.3 g 4.9 g
Saturated fat 0 g 1.1 g
Sugars 5.3 g 9.1 g
Salt 0.2 g 14.8 g
Fiber 1.7 g 15 g
Protein 1.9 g 8.4 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedCelery, Mustard

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chili Seasoning has 84% fewer calories (44 kcal vs 273 kcal).
  • Chili Seasoning has 93% less fat (0.3 g vs 4.9 g).
  • Chili Seasoning has 97% less saturated fat (0 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Chili Seasoning has 42% less sugar (5.3 g vs 9.1 g).
  • Chili Seasoning has 98% less salt (0.2 g vs 14.8 g).
  • Mélange pour volaille has 89% more fiber (15 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Mélange pour volaille has 78% more protein (8.4 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Only Mélange pour volaille lists: Celery, Mustard.

Ingredients

Chili Seasoning

Chili peppers, sea salt, dehydrated lime juice, silicon dioxide

Mélange pour volaille

epices (oignon déshydraté (19%), paprika (18%), ail déshydraté, curcuma, poivre noir (3,8%), graine de coriandre, fenugrec, graine de MOUTARDE, muscade, cardamome, anis, gingembre, fenouil, clous de girofle, graine de CELERI, cannelle, piment de la jamaïque), sel de mer (15%), amidon de pomme de terre, panais en poudre, sucre roux de canne, plantes aromatiques,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chili Seasoning or Mélange pour volaille?

Overall, Chili Seasoning has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chili Seasoning has fewer calories: 44 kcal versus 273 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chili Seasoning has less sugar: 5.3 g versus 9.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons